德国巧克力蛋糕

这是最糟糕的蛋糕食谱。不要浪费时间。当我制作击球时，我知道这个食谱很奇怪。面糊的最终结果看起来更像是巧克力糖霜，而不是面糊。成品是……干燥。触摸时破裂。正如我看到大多数人的蛋糕做到这一点时所做的那样，中间沉没了。将蛋糕从锅中摘下来是一场灾难……他们根本没有在一起。糖霜也很烂。用2罐甜炼乳太甜了。 I only added one can after reading another review and still was not fond of it. I didn’t even eat a slice. I threw the entire thing away. Pathetic recipe.

It’s very dense and the frosting is very good (although got very thick in less time than written). But as another reviewer stated it’s not super moist. Calling it dry is a little harsh but it’s not the best cake I’ve ever made.

除了我以9x13制作并将糖霜切成两半，还足以使顶部的厚层切成两半。

这个蛋糕很棒。我将食谱增加了一半，并使用两个8英寸的平底锅和一个小的邦特锅烘烤。我对中心跌倒而没有烹饪没有任何问题。我跟随食谱，让鸡蛋，黄油和酪乳达到室温。我还按照食谱中所述交替使用酪乳和面粉。我在350的燃气烤箱中烤35分钟。完成后，两个圆形锅都有不错的圆顶。

令人失望。易于制作，但蛋糕很干，可以使用更多的鸡蛋和一些酸奶油。糖霜在顶部太甜了。我应该在两个全罐甜炼乳的罐头中更了解。我会回到下次有巧克力的食谱。

我做了这个，没有问题。这是我做的最好的事情之一。我用较小的平底锅做个人尺寸的蛋糕。

I'd give it 5 stars except the actual recipe has typos. I guessed and used sticks of butter, never figured out what the room temperature butter was for. Also used darker chocolate than semi sweet, evaporated milk instead of condensed and unsweetened coconut. The frosting turned out perfectly - just sweet enough. Will definitely be making this again.

Should have read the comments first! Like many of you, I was suckered by the many 5 star reviews! My cake also fell in the center in spite of cooking for 35 minutes...does not look pretty at all. I’m a pretty decent baker so this is definitely a flaw of the recipe. We will see how it tastes later but I won’t be using this recipe again. Or trusting 5 star reviews on this site.

Why did they all sink? I made them twice. First they sank too but I had opened oven door so I thought that was it. Ugh! So this time I bumped up temp to 365 and added 1Tbs of flour. Didn’t help! I live at high altitude, is that it?Why???? The cake is super yummy and moist it just looks horrible.

I used this recipe for my husbands 40th birthday and it was an absolute hit!! I just added a chocolate ganache on top and a 1 tsp of baking powder!! It was perfect - I will share it in my Instagram @lorenasmenu

因此，我为爸爸的生日做了这个蛋糕，直到我就像整个过程中的一半之前，我都没有看这些评论，他们完全扔了我循环。我不是面包师，只是一个真正没有经验的大学生，但是老实说，这蛋糕真是太漂亮了。是的，蛋糕本身有点基础，但是我的根本没有掉下来。我很高兴这有点简单，因为糖霜是如此丰富和放纵。我所做的唯一区别是将糖和鸡蛋混合物打成更长的时间，总共约6分钟。如果您想为蛋糕带来更多浓郁的风味，我还建议您添加更多融化的巧克力或更多可可粉。我还在糖霜中添加了12盎司的椰子，而不是10。我伴随着一些自制的双香告波旁威士忌冰淇淋，我会心跳加速！

从字面上看，这个食谱没有任何作用。350分钟30分钟后，蛋糕在内部完全液体。我不得不将其放在烤箱中约45分钟，最后15分钟被锡箔纸覆盖，最终的质地耐嚼和坚硬。当我摘下羊皮纸时，它变成了碎片。最重要的是，糖霜拒绝变稠。这是我三个小时的浪费，现在我妈妈没有生日蛋糕。很抱歉，我没有先阅读评论。

鉴于它有5星，我对这个蛋糕寄予厚望！相反，我感到震惊和失望。我遵循指示，做了我应该做的一切，但我的蛋糕蛋糕绝对可怕！它在烤箱中爆炸了！溢出，然后在中间放气！蛋糕很粘，但干燥。如此令人失望！不要做这个蛋糕！很糟糕，对不起！浪费了成分！

我之所以这样做，是因为近6k的“ 5星”评论。直到这个食谱，我才意识到该评论可以被伪装/购买。蛋糕非常干燥，就像其他人所说的那样，掉在中间。此外，糖霜的甜味非常甜。一开始，德国巧克力蛋糕通常很甜，但是没有较深的巧克力海绵无法平衡甜味，它只是病了。您最终获得了本食谱可能使用的两倍以上。我不仅永远不会再制作这个特殊的食谱，而且我再也不会支持一个清楚地欺骗其评论的食谱网站。

我做了这个，糖霜食谱很棒，巧克力蛋糕充其量是平庸的。那不是干的，但我只是...好吧，没什么可写的

I'm guessing they bought reviews. 5,748 "5" ratings and then these three real reviews. was going to make this but now I'll skip

This cake was so incredible, I am definitely saving this recipe! The cake itself was very moist and the frosting is so good too. I'd imagine that if the cake turned out dry for others it was due to overmixing or overbaking - because mine turned out so moist. I should disclaim that i wanted it to look a bit more pretty, so I made my own chocolate buttercream for the exterior, but the filling and top of cake is loaded with the coconut pecan frosting! YUM. I made a double cake recipe for this 4 layered 6" cake, and had extra batter to make a single 8" round cake for my family as well. A single batch of frosting went a long way for the doubled cake.

没有帽子这个狗屎巴掌

我为家人做了这个食谱，这很受欢迎。...因为糖霜。蛋糕本身是干燥的，完全没有灵感。我用三锅做蛋糕，而不是两个锅，以至于每一层都不会填充这么多堆。它仍然是一个慷慨的3/4英寸填充。帮自己一个忙，找到湿的软糖蛋糕食谱，并使用这种糖霜食谱。

我把这个蛋糕制作了三遍 - 每次中间跌落时都在冷却。我是一个很好的面包师，我不明白发生了什么。有了所有这些神话般的评论，我真的很困惑。苏打水是新的，中间煮熟，巧克力被轻轻地折叠起来，它仍然掉下来。任何想法都会有所帮助，因为我不会再做一次。